Global Risk Insights

About the Author Global Risk Insights

Red tape, revolution, conflict, cronyism – all of these political factors make doing business in the global arena a challenge for even the best prepared companies. The world’s rapidly changing political environment poses significant obstacles, but also great opportunities for today’s business community. Understanding the nexus between politics and business has never been more important. Global Risk Insights provides expert political risk analysis for businesses and investors. Our goal is to help individuals and corporations analyze and understand how global political events are impacting economic & business climates. GRI provides this analysis so our readers can make better informed decisions about their economic activities in every corner of the world. From Washington, DC to Cairo to Beijing, our contributors are global in reach, local in expertise and have experience across the public and private sectors. Our contributors include current and former members of the US intelligence community, the financial sector, NGOs, and the Obama administration. GRI has been widely referenced by leading publications, including The Wall Street Journal, The New Yorker, Business Insider and many more. GRI contributors have been featured speakers at global energy conferences, Reuters Trading Africa forums and the London School of Economics Political Risk Society. We have also produced custom reports, including one for the Kuwaiti Minister of Finance.

OPEC’s Influence Has Long Been Exaggerated


The nearly 50% decline in oil prices questions the future of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and casts doubt on its ability to influence prices. However, the role of OPEC has historically been overplayed, and the latest tumult is merely further evidence of the group’s weakness.

Formed in 1960 “to coordinate and unify petroleum policies” and offset the influence of major multinational oil companies, OPEC enjoyed the peak of its geopolitical influence in 1973 when it cut production and stopped shipments to the U.S. and countries supporting Israel in the Yom Kippur War.

Yet, the impact of the embargo was amplified by bad U.S. energy policies. Rather than OPEC, inappropriate schemes such as price controls and Congress’s allocation of oil to various regions and industrial sectors were the primary drivers of the disruption.

Ironically, OPEC’s most influential moment inspired changes in Western energy policy that have eroded the group’s power. A combination of smarter U.S. domestic energy policies, increased investment in alternative energy, improvements in energy efficiency, and innovation in oil technology outside of OPEC regions has boosted the West’s independence from the organization.

The frailty of OPEC and its changing roles were evident long before the recent jump in North American production. After surviving the price slump of the mid-1980s, OPEC had a difficult time in the following decade when weak demand growth and large spare capacity limited its ability to collude. An inability to punish members that refused to adhere to quotas was clearly exposed.

The group regained some footing from 2000 to 2008 as rising prices provided an environment more conducive to collusion. However, even during this time, OPEC was largely a residual supplier, adjusting its output at market prices rather than acting as a price setter.

Importantly, since the financial crisis, Saudi Arabia has taken on a more commanding role, which has been particularly apparent in recent months. OPEC is most effective when limiting supplies, but that option has been put aside by Saudi Arabia’s decision to battle for market share.

At its November 27 meeting, OPEC surprised markets by agreeing to maintain its production target at 30 million barrels a day. The group’s reasoning behind the move was that the lower prices will force U.S. drillers to cut output as their business models become unsustainable.

The decision, driven by Saudi Arabia, was likely unpopular with other OPEC members. Yet in challenging times, national interest takes precedence.

Saudi Arabia has about 85% of global spare production capacity, with an estimated 1.5 to 2 million barrels per day of spare capacity on hand to aid it in the market share battle. Conversely, other members have limited ability to cut exports and lack the cohesion to reduce supplies in the face of Saudi Arabia’s opposing intentions.

The loss of market share and price decline of the mid-1980s was particularly costly to Saudi Arabia, and the Kingdom seems to have no intention of remaining passive in the current environment. Its ambitions marginalize other OPEC members, and highlight the fickleness of the group’s solidarity. OPEC’s influence has often been exaggerated and recent events may prove to be the catalyst for the group’s decline of influence.

Stay Ahead of Everyone Else

Get The Latest Stock News Alerts