Global Risk Insights

About the Author Global Risk Insights

Red tape, revolution, conflict, cronyism – all of these political factors make doing business in the global arena a challenge for even the best prepared companies. The world’s rapidly changing political environment poses significant obstacles, but also great opportunities for today’s business community. Understanding the nexus between politics and business has never been more important. Global Risk Insights provides expert political risk analysis for businesses and investors. Our goal is to help individuals and corporations analyze and understand how global political events are impacting economic & business climates. GRI provides this analysis so our readers can make better informed decisions about their economic activities in every corner of the world. From Washington, DC to Cairo to Beijing, our contributors are global in reach, local in expertise and have experience across the public and private sectors. Our contributors include current and former members of the US intelligence community, the financial sector, NGOs, and the Obama administration. GRI has been widely referenced by leading publications, including The Wall Street Journal, The New Yorker, Business Insider and many more. GRI contributors have been featured speakers at global energy conferences, Reuters Trading Africa forums and the London School of Economics Political Risk Society. We have also produced custom reports, including one for the Kuwaiti Minister of Finance.

Norway Still Optimistic Over Arctic Oil


The drastic fall in oil prices has made petroleum explorations in the Barents Sea seemingly unprofitable. Yet, despite severe economic, technological and environmental concerns, the Norwegian government pushes for increased activities, and recently handed out exploration licenses in the Barents Sea.

The huge fall in global oil prices since June from $115 to around $50 has dramatically lowered cost-margins in the volatile petroleum industry. After 5 years of stable high prices, the recent fall in oil prices is attributed to several reasons: sluggish economic output, the shale gas revolution in the US, a switch to alternative fuels, and finally the unwillingness of OPEC and the Saudis to sacrifice their market share by cutting productions.

The main effect of these developments is felt on the most vulnerable sectors of the oil industry, including the costly, technologically complicated and risky extraction from Arctic areas.

Despite serious concerns over unsustainable profit-margins, the Norwegian government recently awarded 61 new licenses to explore the Barents Sea, 34 of those in the previously undeveloped South East area, signalling the government’s strong political commitment to further develop their Northern territories.

Arctic extraction, a high-cost procedure

Global Risk Insights has previously covered the massive petroleum reserves to be found under the Arctic seabed. However, large-scale extraction has yet to take place, because of the daunting challenges that face prospective companies. In addition to a lack of infrastructure, harsh climate and long transport and supply lines, the operations are technologically challenging in themselves.

All these factors taken together result in the lowest profit margins in the oil industry, and explain why so few operations have ever moved from the planning phase.

Goliat, operated by ENI, is the only field in the Norwegian sector of the Barents Sea where oil production is likely to happen anytime soon, with expected operations to begin in mid-2015. The long-postponed operation has an estimated break-even of $95 dollars a barrel, making current production economically unprofitable.

Political will, industry skeptical

Investor: “it’s there; it’s huge, but it’s not economical profitable”

Both industry and government officials acknowledge the serious economic, environmental and technological concerns affiliated with Arctic exploration, yet there is a strong political will to push oil operations further North. To compensate for the rapidly decreasing outputs from more saturated fields in the North Sea and the Norwegian Sea, the petroleum sector needs continued explorations in new areas.

Yet, the industry itself has been less enthusiastic about new operations in the Norwegian sector in general, and particularly in the expensive Arctic fields. Government officials expressed their disappointment about only receiving one request for developing new fields in all of 2014.

The industry amplified their skepticism at the recent Arctic Frontiers conference in Tromsø, Norway. Investor Jens Ultveit-Moe claimed that current drill operations in the Arctic will be a “financial disaster”, adding that,

We have seen it with the Shtokman field; it’s there; it’s huge, but it’s not economically profitable. The Castberg field has a breaking price of $80 per barrel. With production to start in the late 2020s, breaking price will be $120 per barrel, that is three times today’s level.

Long-term focus

Regardless, there are some major players in the oil industry, who remain optimistic about Arctic oil.

Tim Dodson, the executive vice-president for Statoil, recently claimed that the decision to continue oil production in the Arctic is based on long-term prospects. Despite falling oil prices, Dodson believes huge discoveries and more favourable prices in the future will make Arctic oil exploration profitable, and Statoil has the resources to remain in the game for several decades.

But other long-term developments may jeopardize the Arctic oil industry. Though tensions over Ukraine have not fully transferred to the Arctic arena, there have already been some minor disturbances to Russia-Norway relations in the High North. If unrest in Ukraine escalates, it risks having an impact on Norwegian petroleum ambitions, especially with a growing Russian military presence in the North.

Furthermore, because hydrocarbons break down much slower in cold water, any oil spill would have drastic consequences for the fragile habitat. Environmental opposition to Arctic drilling has become more outspoken globally as well as in Norway, and a recent study argues that all of Arctic fossil fuels should be left buried to prevent catastrophic climate changes.

If voters continue to turn against Arctic oil, or the world adopts a stronger climate change agenda in Paris in December, Norwegian policy makers may adjust their strategy away from oil investments.

Falling oil prices may yet prove to have the most far-reaching political and economic ramifications for 2015, and many observers expect Arctic oil to be one of the casualties.

But Norwegian politicians and oil industry representatives are focusing on the years to come, expecting benefits to reveal themselves in 2030 or later. Current predictions are all over the place: president of Goldman Sachs, Gary Cohn, expects the price to fall to as low as $30 per barrel in the long term.

We find OPEC on the other end of the scale, claiming that prices may rise to as much as $200 dollar per barrel when decreased investments in exploration, set off by the falling prices, leads to significantly lower production output in the long term.

Only time will tell which prediction is most accurate – and whether oil investments in the Arctic are able to beat the current predictions.

Stay Ahead of Everyone Else

Get The Latest Stock News Alerts