Cho Research

About the Author Cho Research

Best tech/finance blogger on TipRanks. Alex Cho is ranked 7th among all financial bloggers, with a sector focus of technology stocks. The research he publishes captures the long-term growth potential of tech franchises, and market valuation. His research recommendations over the span of five-years has averaged into an annualized return of 19.3% across 392 ratings of which 66% were successful. Over his years of publishing, Alex Cho has been an indispensable source of information for an investment minded audience, which is why his lifetime viewership has exceeded ten million in total since 2012, across various media platforms. Furthermore, he’s frequently cited in various local business journals across the United States, and is frequently tagged with the “in-depth” designation on Google News for his public articles. The quality of his research is well known, and is well-respected which is why he’s frequently cited by other authors, journalists, bloggers and experts. Alex Cho was a former founding partner of Alexander & Cohen Capital Management, has worked as a consultant for mid-stage tech companies looking to raise capital or form an exit strategy, with the most recent consultation billed to a client that was generating revenue of $10 million+ in the web domain/registrar segment. Alex Cho is frequently invited to interview members of management at various Fortune 500 tech companies’ due to his outstanding media credentials, and credibility. Furthermore, he frequently attends various tech media events at the request of the event organizers. Alex Cho has a great relationship with Wall Street and Silicon Valley, as well. In the Venture Capital Space, he has sources that are inclusive of VC Partners, and independent research from PitchBook, Mercury Data, eMarketer, MergermarketGroup, and so forth. Anyone facing the public with investment related material needs quality sources, which should be inclusive of insights from Private Equity and various sell-side institutions and debt rating agencies as well (Standard & Poor’s, Fitch, & Moody’s). Alex Cho publishes with the support of Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley Americas, Royal Bank of Canada Capital Markets, United Bank of Switzerland AG, Barclays Americas, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, Credit Suisse AG, PiperJaffray, Wedbush Securities, Oppenheimer & Co., Nomura Securities, BMO Capital Markets, Raymond James, Pacific Crest, SunTrust, Mizuho Securities, Deutsche Bank and Canaccord Genuity. Alex Cho attended ASU via the MAPP program with a 3.76 GPA in business-finance. The genius behind Cho has less to do with his academic accomplishments, but rather his ability to navigate, adapt, and improve the quality of his work through all the activities he has engaged. In the past year, Alex Cho has launched a new marketplace service referred to as Cho’s Investment Research. To learn more about this service, or to receive article notifications, be sure sure to subscribe. We provide frequent updates via our Blog Posts, which goes out to our subscribers.

Nvidia (NVDA): Looking Like Intel (INTC) Isn’t Necessarily a Great Thing


Following Nvidia’s (NVDA) announcement of the Mellanox (MLNX) acquisition earlier this month, the company CEO, Jensen Huang mentioned that they would not pursue any additional acquisitions according to Reuters at a conference.

Of course, it’s hardly surprising given the epic price tag of $6.9 billion to acquire Mellanox, which stretches Nvidia’s balance sheet. Nvidia had $7.4 billion in short-term assets and cash equivalents on the balance sheet based on its Q4’19 earnings. If anything, Nvidia cannot afford to make another all-cash transaction anytime soon, which would require the company to rebuild cash on its balance sheet, but to rebuild another $7 billion in short-term cash could take several years.

While the Mellanox deal sounds practical on the surface it also paid a 7x sales multiple for a business that generated $1.08 billion in revenue in FY’18, and profits of $114 million in FY’18. Meaning, Nvidia paid 60.5x prior-year earnings to acquire the company, which doesn’t afford Nvidia a whole lot in the way of earnings accretion, though they mentioned that there would be immediate accretion in terms of sales and earnings following a Q4’19 (calendar year) transaction close.

The main reasoning for the acquisition was tied to datacenter market share, which is one of the few areas, which still exhibit meaningful revenue growth compared to client computing markets or basically end-consumer purchases of graphics cards. Heightened emphasis on datacenter silicon means paying a massive premium in this environment, but it also exposes Nvidia if in the event they need access to more cash, or if market conditions worsen, as they have in the prior quarter whereby sales declined by 24% over prior year and dil. EPS also declined by 53% year over year.

Perhaps, the acquisition of Mellanox helps with diversifying revenue, as Mellanox has been able to post steady revenue growth figures for the past five-years. Though, the recent acquisition premium could come at a time where much of the growth is already priced into the business.

Nvidia stock has continued to trend higher following the announcement, because it could help cushion the lumpiness of the graphics market cycle (which we have seen recently).

Risks tied to the acquisition didn’t seem to matter, because shareholders seemed to like the transaction. This is partially driven by the rapid growth spurt of Nvidia’s graphic business, which isn’t as sustainable as it was in prior years. There’s bound to be added competition from AMD’s impending graphics card launch, which will include ray-tracing, and Nvidia’s full-year financial outlook implied flat year on year business comps.

Nvidia only markets graphics cards, so the addition of network interconnects makes it somewhat less dependent on its graphics business, which is a first in its entire corporate history.

Mellanox has steadily grown its revenues by 18.25% per year since FY’15, and with the transition to ethernet switches (datacenter connectivity) needed for high bandwidth HPC (high-performance computing) Mellanox has been able to demonstrate heightened revenue diversification away from its InfiniBand business.

This transitions Nvidia into both graphics and network connectivity, effectively looking more and more like Intel. But, looking more and more like Intel isn’t necessarily a great thing, because Intel has gone through periods of stagnation even after paying a lot of money to acquire companies.

Intel wasn’t able to grow shareholder value despite its high-profile acquisition of Altera ($16.7 billion) and Mobile Eye ($15.3 billion). After throwing $30+ billion at large acquisitions, Intel has remained range bound between $40 to $50, and that’s even after producing steady financial results.

Likewise, Nvidia’s latest acquisition could have a similar effect (some excitement initially among shareholders), but when financial results get reported over the next couple years, it’s still going to be a graphics dependent business with some additional categories that marginally contributes to financial results.

Disclosure: Alex Cho has no positions in Nvidia or Mellanox.

 

Read more on NVDA:

 

Stay Ahead of Everyone Else

Get The Latest Stock News Alerts