Good morning and welcome to the fourth week of May. By the way, does anybody know where the first half of 2016 has gone?
Since it is Monday, it’s time to take a step back and review the state of the market and our major market indicators/models as objectively as we can. As usual, the first stop is a review of the price/trend of the market.
Here’s my take:
- From a short-term perspective, the trend remains down.
- So far at least, the downside has been very “orderly”.
- Key near-term support level at 2040 was tested last week.
- My guess is the market’s real support will be at 2020 which is where the 150-day ma currently resides.
- One can argue that the S&P 500 is currently tracing out a classic “cup with a handle” formation, made famous by William O’Neill. Thus, a break above the current downtrend line would produce a buy signal for technicians.
- The cycle composite is now positive for the next 2 weeks and largely positive for the next month and a half.
- My indicators continue to suggest stocks are trading in a mean-reverting mode.
S&P 500 – Daily
View Larger Image
From a longer-term perspective (e.g. looking at a weekly chart of the S&P 500)…
- The intermediate-term trend (price relative to 10-week ma) is now negative – but only slightly so.
- Not much has changed here as the trading range remains intact.
- From my seat, stocks appear to be killing time until a long list of uncertainties can be resolved including the state of the economy, the consumer, retail, and earnings, as well as the election and what the Fed plans to do next.
- I contend that the current action continues to be a consolidation pattern, which, according to the textbooks, should be resolved to the upside.
S&P 500 – Weekly
View Larger Image
Here’s the view of the “state of the trend” from our indicator panel.
- Although there are several red boxes on the board, the readings are not severely negative.
- Overall, I’m going to rate the current board as neutral.
Next up is the momentum indicator board…
- The short-term Trend & Breadth Confirm Model is now neutral. Since 1980, stocks have performed moderately well with the model in a neutral mode. However, over the past 10 years, the neutral mode has actually been the most profitable due to the propensity for stocks to put in a V-Bottom. The model indicates that stocks gain more than 31% on an annualized basis when the model moves to neutral.
- The Industry Health Model remains neutral. However, the model is now moving higher and stocks have tended to perform about 2% per year (annualized) better than average when the model is in this mode.
- Surprisingly, the short-term Volume Relationship Model is not negative. To me this is a plus
- The Volume Thrust Indicator is actually only moderately negative.
- The Breadth Thrust Indicator has moved up to neutral – again, kind of odd for a downtrend.
- Despite the recent weakness in stocks, the historical return average for the momentum board remains slightly positive. This tells us that the selling pressure has not been intense.
Next up is the “early warning” board, which is designed to indicate when traders may start to “go the other way” for a trade.
- My group of short-term Overbought/Sold indicators suggest that an oversold signal has been given.
- However, since the best moves come when all the time-frame stars are aligned, we should note that the intermediate-term indicators show a neutral condition.
- The Mean Reversion Model is very close to giving a buy signal.
- The VIX remains in never-land.
- The Short-term Sentiment Model is now positive and stocks have gained ground at an annualized rate of more than 31% when the model is positive.
- The Intermediate-term Sentiment Model is also positive and sports an historical gain of more than 35% in this mode.
- The Long-term Sentiment Model is neutral (i.e. no longer negative).
- Thus, the sentiment situation suggests that the time to buy stocks for a trade may be close at hand.
Now let’s move on to the market’s “external factors” – the indicators designed to tell us the state of the big-picture market drivers including monetary conditions, the economy, inflation, and valuations.
As a reminder, this board doesn’t change very often.
- There is no change in the overall Monetary picture.
- But when reviewing the Absolute Monetary Model results since 2007, I note that the impact of positive monetary conditions has lost much of its punch. I.E. The average annual returns are MUCH lower since 2007 than for the period from 1980.
- A component of the Economic Model has upticked and suggests the economy is now approaching “strong growth”
- The Inflation Model has downticked to neutral. This means that there is some inflation percolating in the economy.
- All in, the takeaway is this board is less positive than it has been with the current historical return reading below the historical norm.
Finally, let’s turn to our favorite big-picture market models, which are designed to tell us which team is in control of the prevailing major trend.
- The Leading Indicator Model remains positive. However, when viewed in more recent times (since 2000), the market’s return is much lower (+12%/year) than the average of 19% seen since 1980. This tells me that some of the stuff that once was a key leading “tell” for the market has become less valuable since the turn of the century.
- After a brief (one week) trip into positive territory a few weeks back, the Risk/Reward Model remains neutral.
- The External Factor Model has also proved less valuable since 2000, with annual returns now averaging 7.7%, which is well below the rate seen since 1980.
- The average historical annualized return for the board currently stands at 9.6%. This is in line with historical average returns for the stock market.
From a short-term perspective, key support is between 2020 and 2040. Should 2020 give way, rest assured that the bear algos will take over the game for a while. Next, it is interesting that the volume relationship indicators aren’t more negative (a plus) and that the momentum models in general aren’t worse. In addition, it is positive that sentiment conditions now favor the bulls. However, with inflation starting to percolate, investors will need to watch the level of interest rates.
To sum up, I believe the “weight of the evidence” continues to favor the bulls. However, we are not talking about a robust environment here at all. Yet, while everyone on the street is looking for middling/disappointing returns, our models suggest this view might be a bit too dour. Thus, barring a fresh crisis, the models tell me to look for average to better-than average returns for stocks when viewed over the next 12-18 months.