David I. Templeton

About the Author David I. Templeton

HORAN Capital Advisors (http://www.horancapitaladvisors.com) is an SEC registered investment advisor that manages investment portfolios for individuals and institutions. Our firm utilizes a disciplined investing approach that should create wealth for our clients over time. Our investment bias is to invest in companies that generate a steady return over time, i.e., singles and doubles. This singles and doubles approach tends to lead to investments in higher quality dividend growth/cash flow growth companies. On the other hand, there are times when a company's stock price seems to be trading below its fair valuation. Short term gains are possible in these situations. I have been managing investment portfolios for individuals and institutions for over fifteen years and believe investing is like running a marathon and not a sprint. Taking the road less traveled, more often than not, leads to higher returns. Visit: The Blog of HORAN Capital Advisors at (http://disciplinedinvesting.blogspot.com/)

Fed Rate Decision More About The Economy Than The Rate Itself

Probably the most discussed potential Fed decision on rates is the one forthcoming on Thursday. When it is all said and done, the rate increase in and of itself is really not the issue investors should factor into their investment decision. As we have pointed out in prior posts, higher rates have mostly been a positive for stock returns. A primary issue is the state of the economy, both in the U.S. and globally and the tightening impact of a rate increase. Compounding the confusion around the impending rate increase or no increase, is the uncharted territory created by all of the Fed’s quantitative easing activities implemented since the end of the financial crisis.

In reality, a quarter percent (25 basis points) increase from a near zero rate is likely to have no material impact on many fronts. The pace at which the tightening is pursued though is an issue. The other is the fact the Fed states rate decisions will be data dependent going forward. Therein lies the market’s confusion. The Fed has a 2% inflation target which has yet to be reached and it is debatable if the economy is near full employment given the sharp decline in the participation rate. A case can be made that the last QE program was not needed and a tightening cycle should have been started over a year ago. In reality, at the end of QE3 the Fed made clear it would retain bonds purchased under the QE programs, would also reinvest bond proceeds and rates would remain near zero for a “considerable time.” All of these are easing activities. This brings us to the decision on Thursday and the data that outlines economic activity.

Supposedly the Fed’s mandate of an inflation target and employment levels means it does not give too much weight to economic activity outside the U.S. in spite of the global nature of the economy. However, given the interconnected nature of economies around the world, the below chart of purchasing managers indices suggests many are seeing potential weakness ahead. The U.S. PMI that was released earlier this month was reported at 53, down from 53.8, which is the lowest level since October, 2013.

From The Blog of HORAN Capital Advisors

The Empire State manufacturing Survey released today came in far below expectations. Consensus was a reading of -.50 and the reported figure was a worse -14.67. Econoday used the term “shocking weakness” to describe the report noting,

“The shocking weakness in August was no fluke as the Empire State index came in far below expectations for September, at minus 14.67. Next only to August’s minus 14.92, September’s reading is the weakest of the recovery, since April 2009. And, unfortunately, judging by new orders, activity in October may prove to be just as weak. New orders are deeply negative this month, at minus 12.91 vs minus 15.70 in August and the fourth straight negative reading. And manufacturers in the New York region won’t be able to turn to backlogs which are extending their long run of contraction at minus 8.25.

“Searching for positives in this report is difficult. Negative signs sweep components including shipments, at minus 7.98 following August’s minus 13.79. If extended to national data, these results point to trouble for third-quarter GDP. Employment is at minus 6.19 which is the first negative reading since all the way back in January 2013. The workweek, reflecting the weakness in shipments, is down very steeply at minus 10.31. Price data show outright contraction for finished goods at minus 5.15 — the first negative reading since November 2013. And rounding things out is a 10 point loss in the 6-month outlook to 23.21 which is the weakest since, once again, January 2013.”

The weakness in the Empire survey also carried over into the industrial production report released shortly after the Empire survey. Econoday had this to say about the industrial production report.

“A reversal in the auto sector pulled down industrial production in August, falling 0.4 percent vs the Econoday consensus for a 0.2 percent decline. The manufacturing component fell 0.5 percent, also deeper than the consensus at minus 0.3 percent. In an offset, gains in July proved more robust than initially reported with total industrial production revised 3 tenths higher to plus 0.9 percent and manufacturing revised 1 tenth higher, now also at plus 0.9 percent.

“Motor vehicle production is August’s disappointment, down 6.4 percent following July’s giant 10.6 percent spike. When excluding motor vehicle production, however, industrial production was unchanged in August following respectable gains of 0.3 percent in the prior two months. But these readings are far from spectacular and the weakness in the latest month could be a signal of retrenchment tied to Chinese-based volatility.”

Recent weakness in emerging market equities have investors thinking back to the emerging market disruption in 1994 when Greenspan embarked on a tightening cycle. A rate increase in the U.S. resulted in an increase in rates in emerging market countries.

Not unlike today, emerging market countries borrowed in U.S. Dollars. Repaying the debt became more expensive as the Dollar strengthened. Today, the U.S. Dollar has been stronger for several years in spite of U.S. rates remaining low. A part of the Dollar strength is attributable to the European Central Bank’s QE program and Japan’s large QE program. These QE operations taking place outside the U.S. have lowered other counties’ interest rates with the result being a stronger Dollar. A move higher in U.S. rates will likely translate into further US Dollar strength.

The below chart could lead one to make the case that a large part of the strengthening move in the USD has already occurred. The QE activities outside the U.S though are influencing currencies and the uncharted territory aspect of QEs makes it difficult to to determine the extent of QE’s influence on the Dollar.

Lastly, in a post over the weekend we noted the weakness in the retail equity sector and the increase in the inventory to sales ratios for both businesses and retailers. On the positive side, the retail sales report reported today was pretty good. Although the .2% month over month increase was below the .3% consensus, July’s report was revised higher to .7% from .6%. Again, Econday notes,

“For a second report in a row, upward revisions highlight solid growth in retail sales. Retail sales rose 0.2 percent in August with ex-auto at plus 0.1 percent and ex-auto ex-gas at plus 0.3 percent. These are all 1 tenth below consensus. July, however, shows broad upward revisions with total sales at a very strong plus 0.7 percent vs an initial plus 0.6 percent. Ex-auto for July is revised upward by 2 tenths to plus 0.6 percent and ex-auto ex-gas revised upward by 3 tenths to plus 0.7 percent.”

In summary, the Fed’s mandate is focused on inflation and the the YOY change in CPI came in at a low .1% last month. The CPI report for July will be released Wednesday, but it does seem to be  a stretch to think the Fed’s inflation target is even close to being reached. The above sample of economic reports/charts indicates the U.S. economy is growing at a bump along pace at best. The risk is the fact the emerging market economies seem to be more challenged than in U.S. Higher rates are likely to place some pressure on the emerging market countries that are carrying higher levels of debt. Large multinational U.S. companies will likely be further impacted by a stronger Dollar as foreign sales will be more expensive. The second to last chart shows the Dollar has had a significant move already, so it is possible US Dollar strength will be at a more moderate pace going forward even if the Fed raises rates, especially if the rate increases are not pursued as consistently as history would suggest. But yes, the rate increases are to be data dependent so a promise by the Fed not to increase rates, even within some time frame, is not a likely position the Fed wants to put itself into.