Alhambra Investment Partners

About the Author Alhambra Investment Partners

At Alhambra we begin with the belief that you are unique. And since unique situations require unique solutions the first step is to listen to you. There is no one-size-fits-all investment plan, so before we invest the first dollar we get to know you, your goals and your dreams. Next we compare your specific needs and requirements to determine whether active or passive investing is right for you and whether your plan should be strategic or tactical or both. Finally, we take our analysis and engineer a custom investment portfolio that matches who you. Alhambra investment decisions are based on our own extensive research and expertise. Our research staff has almost 100 years of combined market experience. The team drills deep into corporate data to find the smallest details that others miss, looking for true opportunity for our clients. The members of our team are highly respected in the financial industry and their insights are sought after by television business networks and radio programs. Their opinions and commentary are also widely quoted in financial publications as well as a multitude of internet outlets such as RealClearMarkets.com.

Pretty Ugly For Employment; Showing Slump

by Jeffrey P. Snider

If last month was another perfect payroll month, June was at least its opposite. While the Establishment Survey advanced by more than 200k yet again, the average monthly gains has dipped significantly of late (more on that below). Outside of that, however, it was ugly everywhere. All the upward volatility in the rest of the data points from May were undone in June, leaving the payroll picture largely unchanged for the two months. Since January, there has been a clear deceleration or worsening of the employment environment.

The Establishment Survey has averaged only +210k payrolls per month in those five months, down significantly from the nearly +300k of late last year. The Household Survey has calculated only half those gains, worse in terms of full-time employment, and the labor force has, yet again, shrunk.

ABOOK July 2015 Payrolls JuneABOOK July 2015 Payrolls LF2

Full-time jobs which were sharply higher in May were sharply lower in June. As a result, the US economy is still 800k below the November 2007 peak. With those officially not included in the labor force jumping by an enormous 640k, the official accounting of labor decay is short by now 14.5 million. Since a true economy in the modern sense is marked by increasing labor specialization, such lingering weakness in the state of labor utilization actually suggests (proves?) not a recovery but both a depression and far, far smaller legitimately comparably economy.

ABOOK July 2015 Payrolls LF MissingABOOK July 2015 Payrolls FT CyclesABOOK July 2015 Payrolls FT Participation

With average weekly new jobless claims holding at a cycle low, that means the trend-cycle component of the Establishment Survey in particular is most likely highly upwardly biased. The fact that average monthly gains have fallen off sharply in the past few months is quite significant, as even with that bias the mainline payroll report is at least picking up something of a cycle depression. That would mean, factoring trend-cycle, that the Establishment Survey is actually agreeing with the rest of the economic data universe if severely understating the degree to which there is harmony about the growing and persisting negativity.

ABOOK July 2015 Payrolls Jobless PayrollsABOOK July 2015 Payrolls Avgs

Overall, last month’s “perfect” report simply disappeared which means there was nothing so very good about it if it can’t foretell further and similar gains. As I surmised, it was nothing more than monthly variation, with further trends and averages suggesting the same kind of attrition as has been apparent in the rest of the economy for at least all of 2015. That leaves payrolls as subjected to both the cyclical erosion of whatever “slump” is still being exhibited now into June and also in close corroboration of the structural depression, lack of recovery, that is also displayed far-too-universally. In other words, June was worse than May was ever better because what was thought about May no longer really exists. Like the majority opinion of the recovery and especially its status in 2015, it was all statistical phantoms.

ABOOK July 2015 Payrolls FT PotentialABOOK June 2015 World GDP US Counterfactuals

Don’t be late to the party – Click Here to see what 4500 Wall Street Analysts say about your stocks.