Global Risk Insights

About the Author Global Risk Insights

Red tape, revolution, conflict, cronyism – all of these political factors make doing business in the global arena a challenge for even the best prepared companies. The world’s rapidly changing political environment poses significant obstacles, but also great opportunities for today’s business community. Understanding the nexus between politics and business has never been more important. Global Risk Insights provides expert political risk analysis for businesses and investors. Our goal is to help individuals and corporations analyze and understand how global political events are impacting economic & business climates. GRI provides this analysis so our readers can make better informed decisions about their economic activities in every corner of the world. From Washington, DC to Cairo to Beijing, our contributors are global in reach, local in expertise and have experience across the public and private sectors. Our contributors include current and former members of the US intelligence community, the financial sector, NGOs, and the Obama administration. GRI has been widely referenced by leading publications, including The Wall Street Journal, The New Yorker, Business Insider and many more. GRI contributors have been featured speakers at global energy conferences, Reuters Trading Africa forums and the London School of Economics Political Risk Society. We have also produced custom reports, including one for the Kuwaiti Minister of Finance.

US Trade Deficit Soars to Six-Year High: Signal or Noise?


US trade deficit soars to six-year high: Signal or noise?

With the US trade deficit at a six-year high, analysts have attributed the widening gap to a strong appreciation of the US dollar coupled with labor strikes at ports along the California coast. Is the rising deficit a true economic signal, or just noise?

Last week saw a perfect storm for US trade as the Department of Commerce reported the highest trade deficit since October 2008. The trade deficit ballooned by 43% in the month of March, making it the biggest month-to-month jump in 18 years.

The deficit rose from an initial $35.9 billion in February to a surprising $51.4 billion in March. This comes after the trade gap exhibited a sharp decline in January and February. Meanwhile, exports of US goods grew by a meager 0.9%—making exports a serious issue for the US economy.

Analysts have proposed several reasons for the bad news, but the main culprits seem to be the strong appreciation of the US dollar, and a protracted labor strike at multiple ports along the west coast in the months of January and February.

Strong US Dollar

The dollar exhibited its highest appreciation over the past 12 months, growing approximately 17% while other hard currencies such as the Euro and Japanese Yen hit 12 month lows, depreciating 8% and 2.1% respectively.

This has huge implications on US trade, as it has made American goods and services more expensive for foreign buyers and less competitive in the global market; simultaneously, foreign products were cheaper for US consumers. Indeed, the effects of a strengthening dollar have reverberated so far as to have an impact on US corporate profits.


This, coupled with a dropping demand for petroleum, an unusually harsh winter, and steady employment gains that helped fuel even greater domestic demand for foreign goods, created the perfect storm for a sharp increase in imports.

Weak exports attributed to the strong dollar are only further exacerbated by an overall weak global demand due to Eurozone uncertainty and domestic efforts by China and Japan to stimulate their own economies. Overall, imports increased from $222.1 billion in February to $239.2 billion in March, while exports only increased from $186.2 billion in February to $187.8 billion in March.

US Port Strikes

If the appreciation of the US Dollar serves as the economic rationale for the surging trade deficit, a blip in the form of a worker’s strike may have exacerbated the deficit sufficiently to make it an anomaly.

The data shows that the trade deficit actually fell to a six-year low in February, as billions of dollars’ worth of goods were being withheld and barred from entry due to a standoff over a new labor contract by unionized port workers in Los Angeles and Long Beach, California. Approximately 80% of the cargo traffic these two ports handle are foreign imports.

As the strikes ended in late February and the ports slowly began to return to full capacity, the backlog of imports started to compound and exacerbate the trade deficit. Goods withheld from entry included consumer products such as personal computers, automobiles, cell phones, clothing, and furniture.

The same, however, cannot be said for the weak export numbers, as the strike would not have delayed outgoing goods.

Economy Contracts

Many analysts insist that with the labor strikes over, the trade data will begin to smooth out into the second quarter.

It is important to note, however, that while the strike explains the sudden surge in imports in the month of March after a decline in January and February, it would not have changed the overall first quarter trade deficit. The backlog of imports would just have been spread throughout the months of the first quarter. Therefore, it is difficult to attribute the strike as the sole reason for the soaring trade gap.

According to the report, the year-to-date deficit of goods and services increased by $6.4 billion—or 5.2%.

Estimates suggest that the trade deficit subtracted 1.25 percentage points from GDP growth, which would mean that based on the government’s initial estimate of a 0.2% growth rate, the US economy likely contracted in the first quarter.

All things considered, the appreciation of the dollar likely explains the lack of export growth and surge of imports for the entirety of the first quarter, while the worker strikes in January and February explain the sudden swelling of imports, specifically in March.

Whatever the cause of the surging trade gap, the more important question is how this will affect the Federal Reserve’s decision to raise interest rates. If the trade data does not show signs of improvement by the second quarter, it is likely that the Fed will push off raising interest rates to either late fall or early next year.